RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prior studies have compared perioperative opioid prescriptions between carpal tunnel release (CTR) performed wide-awake and with traditional anesthetic techniques, but the association of opioid prescriptions with surgical setting has not been fully explored. The current study assessed the association of opioid prescriptions with surgical setting (office or operating room) for wide-awake CTR. METHODS: Patients with open CTR were identified in an administrative claims database (PearlDiver). Exclusion criteria included age less than 18 years, preoperative data less than 6 months, postoperative data less than 1 month, bilateral surgery, concomitant hand surgery, and traditional anesthesia (general anesthesia, sedation, or regional block). Patients were stratified by surgical setting (office or operating room) and matched by age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, and geographic region. Prior opioid prescriptions, opioid dependence/abuse, substance use disorder, back/neck pain, generalized anxiety, and major depression were identified. Opioid prescriptions within 7 days before and 30 days after surgery were characterized. RESULTS: Each matched cohort included 5713 patients. Compared with patients with surgery in the operating room, fewer patients with office-based surgery filled opioid prescriptions (45% vs 62%), and those prescriptions had lower morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs, median 130 vs 188). These findings were statistically significant on univariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Following office-based CTR, fewer patients filled opioid prescriptions, and filled prescriptions had lower MME. This likely reflects patient and provider attitudes about pain control and opioid utilization. Further patient- and provider-level investigation may provide additional insights that could aid in efforts to reduce perioperative opioid utilization across surgical settings.
RESUMEN
Online patient education materials play an important role in plastic surgery, and surgeons should ensure that materials accurately reflect their patient population. This study compared the skin tone of images in online materials from the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS), academic plastic surgery programs, and private groups to the demographics of the United States (US) reduction mammaplasty population. Images within patient education materials and embedded photo galleries were assessed and skin tones were categorized using the Fitzpatrick Skin Scale (FSS). Two reviewers evaluated 616 images. Scores of 1-3 were categorized as White, while scores of 4-6 were classified as non-White. The proportion of images categorized as White and non-White were compared to the demographics of the reduction mammaplasty population in the US. Of 616 images, 82% were classified as White, while 18% were non-White. This distribution differed significantly from the racial demographic distribution of patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty in the US in 2020, where 48% identified as White and 52% as non-White (p < 0.001). There was also a statistically significant difference in the distribution of FSS scores between the materials from the ASPS, academic programs, and private surgeon groups, with private groups having a lower percentage of non-White images (p = 0.028). These findings suggest that implicit bias may impact the creation of patient education materials for reduction mammaplasty and highlights the need for improvement in distributing patient education materials that accurately represent the diverse reduction mammaplasty population.
